Fee vs. Commission-Based Financial Advisors: What’s the Difference?

The compensation model is one of the most important things to consider when hiring a financial advisor. After all, your relationship with your advisor can span many years. A financial advisor can significantly impact your financial future and help you avoid potential pitfalls. However, if you end up paying too much for their services, it could eat into your returns and hinder your overall financial progress. That is why it is essential to analyze how your financial advisor is compensated. Typically, advisors fall into one of two categories – those who charge a fee for financial advice or those who charge commissions.

Which is a better choice for fee-based vs. commission-based financial advisors? Well, while choosing between these options can be challenging, understanding the differences will help you make an informed decision that aligns with your financial goals. This article will break down the critical distinctions between fee-based and commission-based advisors to help you make the right choice.

Fee-based vs commission based financial advisors – what is the difference?

1. Fee-based financial advisors

Fee-based financial advisors operate under a dual compensation model. They earn their income through a hybrid model that consists of both client fees and, in some cases, commissions from financial products. Clients typically pay fee-based financial advisors for their services through various methods, such as hourly rates, flat fees for specific projects, or a percentage of their Assets under Management (AUM). For example, a fee-based financial advisor may charge a flat retainer if you consult them for a general financial or tax plan. However, if you need some specific guidance on an investment, such as stocks or index funds, you may pay them an hourly rate. Additionally, if the financial advisor actively manages your entire investment portfolio, you may be asked to pay a fee based on a percentage of your AUM. In addition to the fees that you pay directly, fee-based financial advisors can also earn commissions when they sell financial products. These typically include insurance policies, such as annuities. This is where the distinction between fee-based and fee-only financial advisors becomes crucial. Unlike fee-only financial planners, who earn solely from client fees and never receive commissions, fee-based advisors can benefit from both types of income streams.

Many fee-based financial advisors require a minimum account balance, which can range from $500,000 to $1 million. This may make them suitable for only a limited number of clients. However, given that these financial advisors only handle such large accounts, you can expect a high level of expertise and professionalism from them. In terms of fiduciary duty, fee-based financial advisors are more often than not fiduciaries. Hence, they are legally obligated to act in your best interest. Fee-based advisors often provide a wide range of services, including but not limited to the following:

• College expense planning to help you save effectively for your children’s education.
• Retirement planning to ensure a financially comfortable retirement.
• Debt management to help you manage and reduce debt.
• Tax planning to help identify investment strategies to minimize your tax burden.
• Estate planning to ensure a smooth distribution of your assets after death so that your estate does not go through probate.
• Business planning to assist entrepreneurs with their business finances and succession planning

Most of the income earned by fee-based advisors comes directly from client fees. However, a portion of their revenue may also stem from commissions received from brokerage firms, insurance companies, and mutual fund companies when they sell products. Since it can be unclear to understand where a fee-based financial advisor is earning their income, it is essential to have an open dialogue with them from the very start about their compensation model and make sure it bodes well with you and your preferences. Generally, fee-based financial advisors are ideal if you are looking for comprehensive financial planning, which includes a number of financial concerns and goals. They can provide you with more personalized guidance and help you achieve multiple goals at once without neglecting one for the other.

2. Commission-based financial advisors

Commission-based financial advisors earn their income primarily through the sale of financial products. Unlike fee-based financial planners, who charge clients directly through fees or a percentage of their AUM, commission-based advisors receive their incomes from the financial institutions whose products they sell. Commission-based financial advisors may also earn income from the types of accounts they open, such as brokerage accounts. The financial advisor’s commission is directly proportional to the number of transactions. If they sell more products and open more accounts, they earn a higher percentage from the total number of sales, and vice versa. This is one of the reasons this compensation model can lead to conflicts of interest, as these financial advisors may be incentivized by numbers more than the client’s interests.

In many cases, commission-based financial advisors work for companies that make or sell financial products. These may include brokerage platforms, insurance firms, mutual fund houses, etc. However, some of these advisors also work independently and are self-employed. One important distinction between commission-based advisors and fee-only advisors lies in their fiduciary responsibilities. While some commission-based financial advisors may choose to operate as fiduciaries, they are not legally obligated to do so. U.S. laws require commission-based advisors to adhere to only the suitability rule. According to this rule, they must ensure that the financial products they recommend are ‘suitable’ for their clients’ needs and financial situations. However, this standard is less stringent than the fiduciary standard, which requires financial advisors to ‘act’ in their client’s best interests at all times. So, while commission-based advisors must make recommendations that fit your needs, risk appetite, and future goals, they do not have a legal duty to prioritize your financial interests over their own or their employer’s interests. This can sometimes lead to potential conflicts of interest as these advisors may be more inclined to benefit their employers, meet their targets, and promote products that provide higher commissions rather than those that are most beneficial for the client.

Despite the potential drawbacks, commission-based advisors can offer valuable services to clients on various financial matters, including retirement planning, higher education planning, investment planning, etc. However, because their income is primarily dependent on the number of transactions they make, they may be more inclined to recommend specific products, particularly those that generate higher commissions. This can be beneficial if you are looking for specific investment and savings products, such as annuity plans, insurance policies, and others. Commission-based financial advisors may be a good fit for individuals who do not mind paying through commissions rather than upfront fees.

Need a financial advisor? Compare vetted advisors matched to your specific requirements.

Choosing the right financial advisor is daunting, especially when there are thousands of financial advisors near you. We make it easy by matching you to vetted advisors that meet your unique needs. Matched advisors are all registered with FINRA/SEC. Click to compare vetted advisors now.

Fee-based vs commission-based – pros and cons

Fee-based financial advisors – pros

• Transparency: The primary incentive for a fee-based financial advisor is to provide advice that is in the best interest of their clients. These financial advisors have a fiduciary duty, which makes their advice reliable. Moreover, you can take their recommendations more seriously since their income is not tied to selling specific financial products. These financial advisors simply charge a fee for the services they provide. The arrangement is relatively straightforward. There is no way they can offer biased recommendations. Moreover, clients know exactly what they are paying for and can be assured that there are no hidden agendas or conflicts of interest.
• Less conflict of interest: There is generally a lower potential for conflicts of interest with fee-based advisors compared to commission-based financial planners as there are no commissions involved. The financial advice provided by the advisor is based on a thorough understanding of the client’s needs, future goals, and present financial situation. The financial advisor does not receive any commission or any other financial incentive from a third-party financial institution. They are not driven by the potential for earning a commission on a specific product, and all their recommendations are based on their research and understanding of the client’s financial needs.

Fee-based financial advisors – cons

• Suitable for only a specific group of net worth: Fee-based financial advisors often require a minimum account balance, typically between $500,000 to $1 million, which makes them accessible primarily to individuals with substantial net worth. In some cases, smaller accounts do not qualify. For people who are still working to reach this level of financial security, this can feel like a major barrier. This can leave those with smaller portfolios to look for other options or wait until their net worth grows before they can hire a fee-based financial advisor.
• May result in higher fees: Fee-based financial advisors typically charge a percentage of AUM. So, as your assets grow, so do their fees. This can result in higher expenses over time, especially if your investments are performing well. While increasing your wealth is a positive thing, the corresponding rise in fees may become a hindrance. This can make you feel conflicted.
• Hidden conflicts: Fee-based financial advisors, who earn based on the assets they manage, may face a hidden conflict of interest. Since their income is tied to the size of your portfolio, they might be less inclined to recommend strategies that reduce the assets under their management. For example, they may not be supportive of using funds from your investments to pay off a mortgage. This can lead to compromised goals. While your investments may grow, other goals like debt management, starting a business, buying a home, etc., are equally important. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that the financial advisor aligns with your priorities.

Commission-based financial advisors – pros

• Suitable for small portfolios: Commission-based financial advisors are well-suited for investors with smaller portfolios, as they do not impose any minimum account requirements. Unlike fee-based advisors who may require high account balances, these advisors are accessible to clients of all net worth levels. This makes them an attractive option for those just starting out, as well as those who have amassed a certain level of wealth. With no minimum or maximum account limits, they may be more approachable and potentially benefit more people.
• Suitable for investments in specific products: Commission-based financial advisors can be a good choice for those interested in particular products like insurance policies or other commission-based investments. These advisors often have access to a wide range of such products, so you might find exploring and investing in options tailored to your needs easier. However, it is essential to keep in mind that their recommendations may be influenced by the commissions they receive.

Commission-based financial advisors – cons

• Churning: Churning is an unethical practice that some brokers use to increase their commissions. It involves carrying out multiple buying and selling transactions within a client’s account to generate higher transaction fees. Churning can benefit the financial advisor over the client’s best interests. Clients may face increased costs as well as potential losses. It is crucial for investors to be aware of this tactic and monitor their accounts. It is advised to focus on long-term growth rather than short-term gains. In case of any excessive and unnecessary activity, you must confront the advisor.
• Lack of fiduciary duty: The lack of fiduciary duty can be a significant drawback when working with commission-based financial advisors. Without a legal obligation to act in your best interest, these advisors may prioritize their own financial gain over your needs. This can lead to conflicts of interest and confusion.

To conclude

Fee-based vs commission-based financial advisors – the ultimate decision is yours. Your income, net worth, financial goals, and personal preferences will guide you in making the right choice. Now that you understand the differences between the two, you can make a well-informed decision that aligns with your needs. However, thorough research is essential regardless of the type of advisor you choose. You may take recommendations from friends and colleagues. It is also essential to engage in honest conversations with potential financial advisors to ensure they understand your financial objectives.

Use the free advisor match tool to get matched with trustworthy financial advisors who can recommend suitable strategies to attain your financial needs and goals. Answer a few simple questions and get matched with 2 to 3 vetted financial advisors based on your requirements.